Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Game 1 Overview: Knicks Win 101–92 in Indiana
- Game 1 Player Stats: Knicks Performers
- Game 1 Player Stats: Pacers Performers
- Game 2 Overview: Knicks Dominate 136–110 in New York
- Game 2 Player Stats: Knicks Performers
- Game 2 Player Stats: Pacers Performers
- Head to Head Team Stats Comparison
- Key Takeaways from Both Matchups
- FAQs
Introduction
If you follow NBA basketball and want the real breakdown of what happened between these two Eastern Conference teams, you are in the right place. The pacers vs knicks match player stats from their two regular season meetings in 2026 paint a very clear picture: the New York Knicks simply had more firepower when it mattered.
The Indiana Pacers and New York Knicks met twice during the 2025–26 NBA regular season. The Knicks won both games. They took the first one 101–92 on the road in Indiana on March 14, and then absolutely blew the doors off with a 136–110 blowout at home on March 18. These were not close contests by the end.
In this article, you get every major stat, every standout player, and an honest read of what the pacers vs knicks match player stats reveal about both rosters. Whether you are a Knicks fan celebrating or a Pacers fan trying to understand what went wrong, this breakdown covers it all.
Game 1 Overview: Knicks Win 101–92 in Indiana
Date: March 14, 2026 | Venue: Gainbridge Fieldhouse, Indianapolis Final Score: Indiana Pacers 92 — New York Knicks 101
The Knicks came into Indiana and left with a win, but this game was competitive for stretches. The Pacers actually led briefly in the second half, trimming the Knicks lead to single digits. But New York made the key plays when they needed to.
Quarter by Quarter Scoring:
| Quarter | Pacers | Knicks |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 21 | 24 |
| Q2 | 24 | 32 |
| Q3 | 29 | 20 |
| Q4 | 18 | 25 |
| Total | 92 | 101 |
The Pacers actually outscored the Knicks 29–20 in the third quarter, which gave them hope. But New York answered with a dominant fourth quarter, outscoring Indiana 25–18 to close it out. The Knicks biggest lead was 15 points, and Indiana never quite found enough to make a real run.
Game 1 Player Stats: Knicks Performers
Jalen Brunson: The Engine
Jalen Brunson was the best player on the court in Game 1. He finished with 29 points, 9 assists, and 5 rebounds on 44% shooting from the field. He went 7 of 8 from the free throw line and had only 2 turnovers against 9 assists, an assist to turnover ratio of 4.5. When the Knicks needed buckets, Brunson delivered.
OG Anunoby: Efficient and Steady
OG Anunoby put up 25 points, 8 rebounds, and 5 assists. He shot 50% from the field and 50% from three on 4 attempts. He also went 7 of 9 from the free throw line. His true shooting percentage was a strong 62.6%, making him the second most efficient Knick in the game.
Mitchell Robinson: Rebounding Monster
Mitchell Robinson did something remarkable. He grabbed 22 rebounds in this game, including 9 offensive boards. He also scored 12 points on 60% shooting. His double double helped the Knicks gain second chance points (16 total) and control the glass. Robinson had a game efficiency rating of 27, the highest on the team.
Mikal Bridges: Solid Support
Bridges contributed 11 points and 4 rebounds while shooting 44.4% from the field. He was not flashy here, but his plus/minus of +11 showed he was on the court during key Knick runs.
Knicks Team Notes (Game 1):
- 42% field goal percentage
- 46 points in the paint
- 19 free throw attempts, converting 76%
- 58 total rebounds vs Indiana’s 56
- Bench scored 15 points
Game 1 Player Stats: Pacers Performers {#game-1-pacers-stats}
Jarace Walker: Led the Pacers
Jarace Walker was Indiana’s best player in Game 1. He finished with 18 points, 9 rebounds, and 3 assists while shooting 42.9% from the field. He made 3 of 9 from three and went 3 of 4 at the line. His hustle was visible, but the Pacers needed more from their other starters.
Ivica Zubac: Solid Interior Presence
Zubac scored 11 points and grabbed 8 rebounds on 55.6% shooting. He had 1 steal and 1 block. His efficiency rating of 16 made him the second most productive Pacer.
Aaron Nesmith: Energy Off the Bench
Nesmith contributed 12 points on 38.5% shooting. He shot 20% from three on 5 attempts, which hurt his efficiency. His plus/minus of 17 was the worst on the team, reflecting that Indiana struggled when he was on the court during certain stretches.
Andrew Nembhard: Playmaking, Poor Shooting
Nembhard dished out 7 assists but shot just 21.4% from the field on 14 attempts. He scored only 8 points. The Pacers needed more from their point guard to compete.
Pacers Team Notes (Game 1):
- 39.3% field goal percentage (well below Knicks)
- 38 three point attempts, making only 10 (26.3%)
- Only 15 free throw attempts vs New York’s 25
- 11 turnovers
- Bench scored 35 points (a bright spot)
Game 2 Overview: Knicks Dominate 136–110 in New York {#game-2-overview}
Date: March 18, 2026 | Venue: Madison Square Garden, New York Final Score: New York Knicks 136 — Indiana Pacers 110
If Game 1 was competitive, Game 2 was a statement. The Knicks came out firing at Madison Square Garden and never let the Pacers back in. New York led by as many as 27 points and won by 26. The pacers vs knicks match player stats from this game show just how lopsided the contest became.
Quarter by Quarter Scoring:
| Quarter | Knicks | Pacers |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 38 | 34 |
| Q2 | 34 | 30 |
| Q3 | 33 | 27 |
| Q4 | 31 | 19 |
| Total | 136 | 110 |
The Knicks led in every single quarter. They outscored Indiana in the final period 31–19, which told you exactly how drained the Pacers were by the end. New York shot 54% from the field and an eye popping 43.9% from three.
Game 2 Player Stats: Knicks Performers
Josh Hart: Historic Performance
Josh Hart had one of the most efficient games you will ever see. He scored 33 points on 12 of 13 shooting, including a perfect 5 of 5 from three. He also added 7 rebounds, 5 assists, and 2 steals. His true shooting percentage was an almost unbelievable 108.6%, which reflects how rarely he missed. Hart’s efficiency rating was 42, the best player in the game by a significant margin.
OG Anunoby: Back at It
Anunoby followed up his 25 point game with 26 points in Game 2. He shot 76.9% from the field (10 of 13) and 80% from three. He finished with 8 rebounds and 4 assists. His true shooting percentage here was 93.7%. In two games against Indiana, Anunoby combined for 51 points on extraordinary efficiency.
Karl-Anthony Towns: Double Double
KAT posted 22 points and 11 rebounds with 3 steals and 2 assists. He shot 42.9% overall but was especially effective on the glass, pulling down 5 offensive boards. His plus/minus of +20 showed how well the Knicks performed when he was on the floor.
Jose Alvarado: Stunning Off the Bench
Alvarado came off the bench and delivered 16 points and 10 assists with just 1 turnover, an assist to turnover ratio of 10.0. He shot 50% from the field and 57.1% from three. This kind of output from a reserve point guard is what separates contenders from pretenders.
Mikal Bridges: Distributor Role
Bridges scored only 10 points but handed out 5 assists without a turnover. His plus/minus of +28 was second best on the team, showing how well the Knicks played with him in the lineup.
Knicks Team Notes (Game 2):
- 54% field goal shooting (dominant)
- 43.9% from three on 41 attempts
- 38 assists as a team (outstanding ball movement)
- 13 steals
- 62 points in the paint
- 29 bench points
- 23 points off turnovers
Game 2 Player Stats: Pacers Performers
T.J. McConnell: Double Double Effort
Despite the loss, McConnell put up a respectable 10 points and 10 assists with 3 rebounds. He shot 50% from the field and had a 5.0 assist to turnover ratio. A solid effort in a game Indiana lost badly.
Obi Toppin: Efficient But Not Enough
Toppin was the Pacers’ most efficient player. He scored 15 points on 75% shooting, including 3 of 5 from three. His true shooting percentage was 93.8%. He also chipped in 3 rebounds and 3 assists. He played well, but Indiana was fighting a losing battle.
Jarace Walker: Back Again
Walker matched his Game 1 effort with 16 points, 5 rebounds, and 5 assists, but also had 5 turnovers. His turnover problem hurt Indiana’s ability to sustain any momentum.
Aaron Nesmith: Shooting Well
Nesmith scored 14 points on 62.5% shooting and 66.7% from three. He was one of the few Pacers who shot the ball well in Game 2.
Kobe Brown: Bright Spot Off the Bench
Brown gave Indiana 13 points on 62.5% shooting with 5 rebounds and 2 blocks. He was efficient, but the hole Indiana found itself in was too deep.
Pacers Team Notes (Game 2):
- 51.8% field goal shooting (actually solid)
- 18 total turnovers (backbreaking)
- Only 7 free throw attempts (vs New York’s 13)
- 31 assists as a team
- 40 total rebounds vs Knicks’ 52
- Indiana’s defense allowed 62 points in the paint
Head to Head Team Stats Comparison
Here is a side by side look at key team numbers across both pacers vs knicks match player stats matchups:
| Stat | Knicks (G1) | Pacers (G1) | Knicks (G2) | Pacers (G2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Points | 101 | 92 | 136 | 110 |
| FG% | 42.0% | 39.3% | 54.0% | 51.8% |
| 3P% | 28.6% | 26.3% | 43.9% | 44.7% |
| Rebounds | 58 | 56 | 52 | 40 |
| Assists | 20 | 21 | 38 | 31 |
| Turnovers | 12 | 11 | 9 | 18 |
| Points in Paint | 46 | 38 | 62 | 46 |
| Bench Points | 15 | 35 | 29 | 46 |
| Biggest Lead | 15 | 2 | 27 | 6 |
A few things stand out immediately. The Knicks won the rebounding battle in both games. They scored more points in the paint. And critically in Game 2, the Pacers gave the ball away 18 times while New York only turned it over 9 times. Those 9 extra possessions are essentially a free quarter for the Knicks.
The Pacers actually shot the ball reasonably well in Game 2, at 51.8% from the field. But shooting well does not matter when you give away 18 possessions. This is one of the clearest lessons the pacers vs knicks match player stats teach you.
Key Takeaways from Both Matchups
1. The Knicks have elite star power. Brunson, Anunoby, Hart, KAT: these are four legitimate offensive weapons. In both games, at least two of them went for 20 or more points. Indiana simply does not have that same tier of talent right now.
2. Indiana’s turnovers are a season long problem. 11 turnovers in Game 1. 18 in Game 2. Against a fast, athletic Knicks team that converts turnovers into fast break points, that is a recipe for losing by double digits.
3. OG Anunoby was the real difference maker in this series. He scored 51 combined points across both games on outstanding shooting efficiency. He is one of the most underrated two way players in the NBA right now.
4. Indiana’s bench was actually productive. Bench players scored 35 in Game 1 and 46 in Game 2. The starters let the team down more than the reserves did.
5. The Knicks are a legitimate Finals contender. Their ball movement, rebounding, and depth showed up clearly in these two games. The data from the pacers vs knicks match player stats confirms they are built to go deep in the playoffs.
FAQs
Q1: What was the final score of the Pacers vs Knicks games in 2026? The Knicks won both games. The first ended 101–92 in Indiana, and the second was a 136–110 blowout at Madison Square Garden.
Q2: Who was the leading scorer in the Pacers vs Knicks match player stats? Josh Hart led all scorers in Game 2 with 33 points on 12 of 13 shooting. Jalen Brunson led all scorers in Game 1 with 29 points.
Q3: How did OG Anunoby perform against the Pacers? Anunoby was outstanding. He scored 25 points in Game 1 and 26 in Game 2. His combined shooting percentage across both games was remarkably high.
Q4: Who was Indiana’s top performer across both games? Jarace Walker led the Pacers in both contests with 18 points and 16 points respectively. He also added rebounds and assists each time.
Q5: Did any Pacers player record a double double in these games? T.J. McConnell recorded a double double in Game 2 with 10 points and 10 assists. Mitchell Robinson recorded a double double for the Knicks in Game 1 with 12 points and 22 rebounds.
Q6: How many turnovers did the Pacers commit in both games? Indiana committed 11 turnovers in Game 1 and a damaging 18 in Game 2. Those 29 combined turnovers directly cost them points against a Knicks team that scores in transition.
Q7: What was Josh Hart’s shooting percentage in Game 2? Hart shot 92.3% from the field, including a perfect 5 of 5 from three. His true shooting percentage was 108.6%, one of the most efficient single game performances of the 2025–26 season.
Q8: How did the Knicks’ bench perform in these two games? New York’s bench scored 15 points in Game 1 and 29 in Game 2. Jose Alvarado was the star off the bench in Game 2 with 16 points and 10 assists.
Q9: Who led the Pacers in assists across both games? Andrew Nembhard dished out 7 assists in Game 1 and T.J. McConnell added 10 in Game 2. McConnell’s Game 2 performance was especially impressive given the circumstances.
Q10: What do the pacers vs knicks match player stats say about both teams going forward? The numbers show that the Knicks are deeper, better at protecting the ball, and have more reliable star performances. The Pacers have pieces but need to address their turnover issues and find more consistent production from their starting lineup.
Conclusion
If you look at the full pacers vs knicks match player stats, one story emerges very clearly. The Knicks are simply the better team right now. They have better stars, better depth, and better execution in the moments that decide games. Brunson and Anunoby are a formidable duo, and when Hart or KAT add a big night on top of that, teams like Indiana have no answer.
For Pacers fans, the bright spots are real. Jarace Walker is developing into a reliable piece. The bench gives the team energy. But until Indiana fixes the turnover problem and finds a consistent third star, they will struggle to compete with the Knicks at full strength.
The pacers vs knicks match player stats do not lie. New York took both games and sent a clear message. They are one of the Eastern Conference’s elite teams this season, and these two matchups proved it.
What do you think? Can the Pacers ever match the Knicks with this current roster? Drop your thoughts and share this article if you found it useful.
Also Read In connectionssportshint.com
Email: johanharwen314@gmail.com
Author Name: Hamid Ali
About the Author: Hamid Ali is a sports writer and NBA analyst with over a decade of experience covering professional basketball. He specializes in breaking down player performance data and translating complex statistics into stories that any fan can follow. Hamid has contributed to several sports platforms across South Asia and the Middle East, and he is known for his ability to spot trends that most casual observers miss. When he is not watching game film, he is probably arguing about three point efficiency at a dinner table somewhere.
